Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2017, 08:43 PM   #1
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Trump administration may go after legal pot.

Today Sean Spicer announce that the Trump administration is looking into going after states wth legal recreational pot. He said it is a scourge similar to the opioid epidemic around the country.

Trump administration signals a possible crackdown on states over marijuana - LA Times

If anyone could use a little OG Kush it's Sean Spicer.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 08:46 PM   #2
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE
Trump!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rent free in Bladewire's head
Posts: 6,442
Good

We don't need any more potheads!
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 08:48 PM   #3
ruff
I have a plan
 
ruff's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: WA - St Kitts
Posts: 5,425
Part of the Republican state rights thingy they've been talking about. You know, states rights about transgender toilets, but not pot. State rights except when they don't want states to have rights. Yeah, that's it. More minions governing the misfits.
__________________
Slixa
ruff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 08:49 PM   #4
mineistaken
See signature :)
 
mineistaken's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ICQ 363 097 773
Posts: 29,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyClips View Post
Good

We don't need any more potheads!
mineistaken is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 08:50 PM   #5
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 74,434
State Rights! State Rights! I thought that was the Republican excuse for trying to do away with transgender bathrooms, abortion, gay rights.. ect..ect..

But as usual it's only state rights if they agree with it..
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 08:52 PM   #6
mineistaken
See signature :)
 
mineistaken's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ICQ 363 097 773
Posts: 29,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff View Post
Part of the Republican state rights thingy they've been talking about. You know, states rights about transgender toilets, but not pot. State rights except when they don't want states to have rights. Yeah, that's it. More minions governing the misfits.
Are transgender toilets regulated by federal law in the same manner marijuana is?
mineistaken is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 08:56 PM   #7
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett View Post
State Rights! State Rights! I thought that was the Republican excuse for trying to do away with transgender bathrooms, abortion, gay rights.. ect..ect..

But as usual it's only state rights if they agree with it..
I have always said that the GOP is all about less government and more personal freedom so long as they approve of the freedoms you wish to exercise.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 08:58 PM   #8
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE
Trump!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rent free in Bladewire's head
Posts: 6,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I have always said that the GOP is all about less government and more personal freedom so long as they approve of the freedoms you wish to exercise.
Freedom to smoke a joint and drive?
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:00 PM   #9
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,841
Boy that will be a dumb move on Trump's part.

Why does the govt. always feel it has the right to run people's lives? Trump, of all people knows better.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:00 PM   #10
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyClips View Post
Freedom to smoke a joint and drive?
Nope. That would be driving under the influence which is illegal and wrong and anyone who does it should be punished harshly.

If I want to kick back in my house and light up a little weed to relax, I'm not hurting anyone and the government should have no say in what I am doing.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:04 PM   #11
beerptrol
Confirmed Asshole
 
beerptrol's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar.
Posts: 12,722
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyClips View Post
Freedom to smoke a joint and drive?
Freedom to smoke a joint while your mom smokes my pole

You're so fucking retarded. Isn't past your bed time
__________________
“If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
-- Ulysses S. Grant
beerptrol is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:07 PM   #12
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
Nope. That would be driving under the influence which is illegal and wrong and anyone who does it should be punished harshly.

If I want to kick back in my house and light up a little weed to relax, I'm not hurting anyone and the government should have no say in what I am doing.
Exactly
And I don't even smoke pot. But if I want to...NOBDOY should be able to tell me I can't.

We are grown adults and perfectly capable of making our own choices.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:10 PM   #13
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Exactly
And I don't even smoke pot. But if I want to...NOBDOY should be able to tell me I can't.

We are grown adults and perfectly capable of making our own choices.
Very true!
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:11 PM   #14
mineistaken
See signature :)
 
mineistaken's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ICQ 363 097 773
Posts: 29,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Boy that will be a dumb move on Trump's part.

Why does the govt. always feel it has the right to run people's lives? Trump, of all people knows better.
As far as I remember you advocated all narcotics (cocaine, heroine etc) being legal.
Just to add some perspective to your opinions on this matter
mineistaken is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:13 PM   #15
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,841
Yep, the govt. shouldn't rule over you and tell you what you can and can't do.

And your prudish opinions shouldn't be allowed to rule other people's lives.

You don't like narcotics? Don't take them.

You like to do a bump of coke on the weekend with a few drinks? That's YOUR business.
THAT is my perspective.

I'm not your daddy and you're not a child. And the govt. isn't your daddy either.
Grown people should be able to do as they please unless they hurt someone or steal from someone.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:17 PM   #16
mineistaken
See signature :)
 
mineistaken's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ICQ 363 097 773
Posts: 29,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Yep, the govt. shouldn't rule over you and tell you what you can and can't do.

And your prudish opinions shouldn't be allowed to rule other people's lives.

You don't like narcotics? Don't take them.

You like to do a bump of coke on the weekend with a few drinks? That's YOUR business.
THAT is my perspective.

I'm not your daddy and you're not a child. And the govt. isn't your daddy either.
Grown people should be able to do as they please unless they hurt someone or steal from someone.
My perspective is that junkies COST to society. Meaning EVERYONE pays for their treatment, for their inability to work and so on and on. Not to mention some addicts actually steal or hurt in order to get the dose.
That are the reasons to prohibit it.

Same logic - some people say that safety belts should not be enforced as it is HIS/HER own life. Do you agree with that?
I do not because losing those lives actually COST to society (one less person to contribute etc etc). That is why they are enforced, even though it is his/her own life...
mineistaken is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:23 PM   #17
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken View Post
My perspective is that junkies COST to society. Meaning EVERYONE pays for their treatment, for their inability to work and so on and on. That is the sole reason to prohibit it.

Same logic - some people say that safety belts should not be enforced as it is HIS/HER own life. Do you agree with that?
I do not because losing those lives actually COST to society (one less person to contribute etc etc). That is why they are enforced, even though it is his/her own life...
I got educated on what addiction really is last year after attending some educational seminars on the subject by a top professional in the field.

Only a very TINY portion of people are addicts. And if you ARE an addict..you are already one before you touch your first drink of alcohol or your first prescription pain killer.
Your receptors are just sitting there waiting for it.

As for the 99.9% of the rest of us...we are NOT addicts and don't need the govt. telling us what to do.

The "junkies" who cost society??? They are going to find and take whatever they are addicted to regardless of what you or the govt. tells them to do.
Addiction hijacks the brain and they have no choice.

An addict could care less about legalities.

All the govt. does with the "war on drugs" is turn it's own citizens into criminals.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:32 PM   #18
mineistaken
See signature :)
 
mineistaken's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ICQ 363 097 773
Posts: 29,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
All the govt. does with the "war on drugs" is turn it's own citizens into criminals.
You can say that with any crime... Lets abolish punishment for crimes (ok lets leave those that directly hurt others)...
mineistaken is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 09:57 PM   #19
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken View Post
My perspective is that junkies COST to society. Meaning EVERYONE pays for their treatment, for their inability to work and so on and on. Not to mention some addicts actually steal or hurt in order to get the dose.
That are the reasons to prohibit it.

Same logic - some people say that safety belts should not be enforced as it is HIS/HER own life. Do you agree with that?
I do not because losing those lives actually COST to society (one less person to contribute etc etc). That is why they are enforced, even though it is his/her own life...
1. Seatbelt laws are enforced not because of the value of that person's life to society as a whole, but because if they are killed/crippled/seriously injured during a car accident insurance companies have to pay more in settlements. There are fewer of these deaths/injuries if people wear seat belts so insurance companies lobbied to get seatbelt laws passed in order to save them money.

2. Most of the people who are smoking pot legally now were smoking it illegally before. Sure, there are medical patients and others who are recent converts to it once it became legal (especially with recreational), but most of these people were smokers before. The difference is now the money is going to local businesses and taxes are going to the state and the money is being used for good things instead of going to drug cartels.

3. Addiction sucks, but it exists and we have to deal with it. The problem is that the current legal system doesn't do that. If you are a drug addict and you get caught by the police and end up in jail, you likely will get no drug treatment therapy while you are in there. As soon as you are out you will likely go back to using. Instead of throwing addicts in jail and hoping they will magically get better, we should be putting them in rehabs and treatment centers where they can get professional help and have a better shot of turning their lives around.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 10:04 PM   #20
beerptrol
Confirmed Asshole
 
beerptrol's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar.
Posts: 12,722
But feel free to keep popping those legal prescription pills and abusing that alcohol

Trump is doing things to benefit big money.......not 1 thing to help the middle and poor class
__________________
“If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
-- Ulysses S. Grant
beerptrol is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 10:09 PM   #21
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by beerptrol View Post
But feel free to keep popping those legal prescription pills and abusing that alcohol

Trump is doing things to benefit big money.......not 1 thing to help the middle and poor class
Part of what annoyed me the most about the story is Spicer saying that Trump believes pot smoking is as bad as the opioid epidemic this country is in. Just the other day I saw a piece talking about how states with Medical pot are seeing up 25% fewer deaths from Opioid overdose.

But AG Sessions also said that the Trump administration will continue to use privately owned and operated prisons. So they got to do something to keep getting people to fill those for-profit prisons.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 02:12 AM   #22
pimpmaster9000
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pimpmaster9000's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyClips View Post
Good

We don't need any more potheads!
it has nothing to do with more or less potheads...it has everything to do with crime and rewarding criminals with a lucrative underground non taxable market...90% of all crime, according to the DEA is directly or indirectly linked to narcotics trade...
__________________
Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
pimpmaster9000 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 06:29 AM   #23
The Porn Nerd
Living The Dream
 
The Porn Nerd's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Inside a Monitor
Posts: 19,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken View Post
My perspective is that junkies COST to society. Meaning EVERYONE pays for their treatment, for their inability to work and so on and on. Not to mention some addicts actually steal or hurt in order to get the dose.
That are the reasons to prohibit it.

Same logic - some people say that safety belts should not be enforced as it is HIS/HER own life. Do you agree with that?
I do not because losing those lives actually COST to society (one less person to contribute etc etc). That is why they are enforced, even though it is his/her own life...
Your 'perspective' is odd given you are Dutch, correct? This argument that it "costs society" is quite ridiculous. How much does alcohol addiction "cost society"? Are you advocating we abolish drinking? Bet that would go over well in Europe where you all drink like fishes. Drunkenness, sexual and physical abuse, kidney and liver disease, less productivity - all because of (legal) alcohol.

How about the cost to society for smoking? Want to ban cigarettes? Again, since most Europeans smoke like chimneys I doubt this policy would go over very well in Europe.
__________________
My Affiliate Programs:
Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold (Coming Soon)

Over 90 paysites to promote!
ICQ: 579915163
Skype: peabodymedia
The Porn Nerd is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 06:36 AM   #24
Paul&John
Confirmed User
 
Paul&John's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: YUROP
Posts: 8,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post
....in Europe where you all drink like fishes..
__________________
Use coupon 'pauljohn' for a $1 discount at already super cheap NameSilo!
Anal Webcams | Kinky Trans Cams Live | Hotwife XXX Tube | Get your Proxies here
Paul&John is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 06:40 AM   #25
just a punk
So fuckin' bored
 
just a punk's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,344
Because...

__________________
Obey the Cowgod
just a punk is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 06:41 AM   #26
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
...
But AG Sessions also said that the Trump administration will continue to use privately owned and operated prisons. So they got to do something to keep getting people to fill those for-profit prisons.
Sessions is bad news.

He hasn't gotten to dealing with the "evils of internet porn" yet ... the shitstorm is coming
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 06:42 AM   #27
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Boy that will be a dumb move on Trump's part.

Trump, of all people knows better.
You made a mistake by saying Trump knows something.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 07:09 AM   #28
pimpmaster9000
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pimpmaster9000's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post

How about the cost to society for smoking? Want to ban cigarettes? Again, since most Europeans smoke like chimneys I doubt this policy would go over very well in Europe.
the WHO claims ONE BILLION people will die in this century from the effects of tobacco...ONE BILLION!
__________________
Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
pimpmaster9000 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 07:16 AM   #29
beerptrol
Confirmed Asshole
 
beerptrol's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar.
Posts: 12,722
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
Part of what annoyed me the most about the story is Spicer saying that Trump believes pot smoking is as bad as the opioid epidemic this country is in. Just the other day I saw a piece talking about how states with Medical pot are seeing up 25% fewer deaths from Opioid overdose.

But AG Sessions also said that the Trump administration will continue to use privately owned and operated prisons. So they got to do something to keep getting people to fill those for-profit prisons.
Yep, good time to buy stock of companies who own/run for profit private prisons
__________________
“If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
-- Ulysses S. Grant
beerptrol is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 07:17 AM   #30
RedFred
Confirmed User
 
RedFred's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,782
How ironic on the same day Sessions announced he is reversing Obama's policy to stop using private prisons.

Attorney General indicates feds will reverse course on using private prisons
RedFred is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 07:37 AM   #31
Matt-ADX
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,497
Robbie

Reading your posts, I feel like you are libertarian more than republican. Am I right? if not what makes you lean more Republican.
Matt-ADX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 07:38 AM   #32
Matyko
PsyHead
 
Matyko's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 8,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
Nope. That would be driving under the influence which is illegal and wrong and anyone who does it should be punished harshly.

If I want to kick back in my house and light up a little weed to relax, I'm not hurting anyone and the government should have no say in what I am doing.
QTF

And Robbie's reply to this is awesome too.
__________________
-=- Register with our ref link and we help you with the setup! -=-
AdSpyglass.com - Double your profit from brokers
Matyko is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 08:15 AM   #33
BlackCrayon
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BlackCrayon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 19,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken View Post
My perspective is that junkies COST to society. Meaning EVERYONE pays for their treatment, for their inability to work and so on and on. Not to mention some addicts actually steal or hurt in order to get the dose.
That are the reasons to prohibit it.

Same logic - some people say that safety belts should not be enforced as it is HIS/HER own life. Do you agree with that?
I do not because losing those lives actually COST to society (one less person to contribute etc etc). That is why they are enforced, even though it is his/her own life...
the cost of enforcing such laws that everyone is going to break anyways costs a lot. the "war on drugs" has cost billions and achieved basically nothing. millions of productive people use pot medicinally and recreationally. addicts will be addicts no matter what laws you make up. using the word junkie when talking about weed is laughable. abuse of legal medication is probably the biggest problem out there. kids here in my quiet little burb are ODing left and right on fentanyl.
__________________
you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..
BlackCrayon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 08:18 AM   #34
AndyA
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl.
Posts: 1,670
FUCK ME!

I fucking knew it. These cocksuckers
AndyA is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 08:22 AM   #35
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt-ADX View Post
Robbie

Reading your posts, I feel like you are libertarian more than republican. Am I right? if not what makes you lean more Republican.
I am a registered Libertarian.

I voted Obama in 2008, Gary Johnson in 2012 and Trump in 2016.

I don't intentionally lean towards any party. I just vote for who I think has the best solutions.

In 2016 I listened to Hillary and Trump. Hillary's public positions were very vague...but seemed to me to be a continuance of the way the economics of our country were going. I disagreed with her tax plan, economic plan, foreign policy, and trade ideas.

I agreed with Trump 100% on those issues.
And I voted my wallet.

I'm pissed that the media and the Democrats are so butt-hurt over losing the election and being 100% wrong that they are doing everything they can think of from their old-school political playbook to stop Trump.

I voted for change for the economy.
No, I don't agree with Trump's "wall" or this pot thing.

But it's hard for me to voice any criticism when there are all the delicate "snowflakes" acting insane on here.
I find myself "defending" the President in the arguments, when I don't really want to.

I'd rather wait (just like I did in 2008 with hopefulness for Obama) and allow the man to get some things done and see the RESULTS.
Then if it's fucked up...I could voice rational disagreement and criticism.

Just like this pot issue. I think it's a big mistake on Trump's part if he allows Sessions to move forward with this.
He is probably thinking it will help him with "conservatives" (because a quick look at Trump's total life shows he has always been a liberal) and shut them up.

I think he's dead wrong about that.
He proved in the campaign that he didn't have to suck up to conservatives. And he still won.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 10:41 AM   #36
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE
Trump!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rent free in Bladewire's head
Posts: 6,442
FAKE NEWS

Trump said it was a states rights' issue...
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 11:11 AM   #37
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post
Your 'perspective' is odd given you are Dutch, correct? This argument that it "costs society" is quite ridiculous. How much does alcohol addiction "cost society"? Are you advocating we abolish drinking? Bet that would go over well in Europe where you all drink like fishes. Drunkenness, sexual and physical abuse, kidney and liver disease, less productivity - all because of (legal) alcohol.

How about the cost to society for smoking? Want to ban cigarettes? Again, since most Europeans smoke like chimneys I doubt this policy would go over very well in Europe.
He's not Dutch, he's Slovakian. He's a Ludak, which is slang for being a member of the Slovakian Peoples Party https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slovak_People's_Party
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 11:15 AM   #38
DBS.US
Geo Cities
 
DBS.US's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA
Posts: 11,768
Ban the Dumb Ass Pot heads, not the Pot.
__________________
Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

DBS.US is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 11:22 AM   #39
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam View Post
Sessions is bad news.

He hasn't gotten to dealing with the "evils of internet porn" yet ... the shitstorm is coming
Yep and his new coservative FCC chairmain is just waiting for the word to flip the switch. Good read https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-internet-law/
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 11:24 AM   #40
Matt-ADX
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
I am a registered Libertarian.

I voted Obama in 2008, Gary Johnson in 2012 and Trump in 2016.

I don't intentionally lean towards any party. I just vote for who I think has the best solutions.

In 2016 I listened to Hillary and Trump. Hillary's public positions were very vague...but seemed to me to be a continuance of the way the economics of our country were going. I disagreed with her tax plan, economic plan, foreign policy, and trade ideas.

I agreed with Trump 100% on those issues.
And I voted my wallet.

I'm pissed that the media and the Democrats are so butt-hurt over losing the election and being 100% wrong that they are doing everything they can think of from their old-school political playbook to stop Trump.

I voted for change for the economy.
No, I don't agree with Trump's "wall" or this pot thing.

But it's hard for me to voice any criticism when there are all the delicate "snowflakes" acting insane on here.
I find myself "defending" the President in the arguments, when I don't really want to.

I'd rather wait (just like I did in 2008 with hopefulness for Obama) and allow the man to get some things done and see the RESULTS.
Then if it's fucked up...I could voice rational disagreement and criticism.

Just like this pot issue. I think it's a big mistake on Trump's part if he allows Sessions to move forward with this.
He is probably thinking it will help him with "conservatives" (because a quick look at Trump's total life shows he has always been a liberal) and shut them up.

I think he's dead wrong about that.
He proved in the campaign that he didn't have to suck up to conservatives. And he still won.
Yeah I agree with a lot of what you are saying.

What are your thoughts about having to poll nationally @ 15% to get into the presidential debate? I listened to quite a bit of Gary Johnson and I really think that had he been allowed to debate he would have convinced a massive number of people to vote for him because so many felt they had little choice with such poor candidates on both sides.

Why did you not vote Johnson this time and went with Trump? Was it because you felt you needed to vote for the lesser of 2 evils?
Matt-ADX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 11:25 AM   #41
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE
Trump!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rent free in Bladewire's head
Posts: 6,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt-ADX View Post
Yeah I agree with a lot of what you are saying.

What are your thoughts about having to poll nationally @ 15% to get into the presidential debate? I listened to quite a bit of Gary Johnson and I really think that had he been allowed to debate he would have convinced a massive number of people to vote for him because so many felt they had little choice with such poor candidates on both sides.

Why did you not vote Johnson this time and went with Trump? Was it because you felt you needed to vote for the lesser of 2 evils?
Johnson has absolutely no charisma and is not even a libertarian
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 11:35 AM   #42
Matt-ADX
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyClips View Post
Johnson has absolutely no charisma and is not even a libertarian
He could use a little more pep in his step. Why is he not a libertarian? He says he has been since he was a teen, read a book about what a libertarian was and since then has been. He was a Republican as Governor but that's probably the same reasoning as why Sanders and Trump switched. Gotta get on the big teams to win
Matt-ADX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 11:36 AM   #43
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE
Trump!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rent free in Bladewire's head
Posts: 6,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt-ADX View Post
He could use a little more pep in his step. Why is he not a libertarian? He says he has been since he was a teen, read a book about what a libertarian was and since then has been. He was a Republican as Governor but that's probably the same reasoning as why Sanders and Trump switched. Gotta get on the big teams to win
What he says and what he's voted for are two different things

He's a cuck
JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 12:16 PM   #44
ruff
I have a plan
 
ruff's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: WA - St Kitts
Posts: 5,425
Term limits in Congress and the House of Representatives would freshen things up. Never going to happen though.
__________________
Slixa
ruff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 12:31 PM   #45
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt-ADX View Post
Yeah I agree with a lot of what you are saying.

What are your thoughts about having to poll nationally @ 15% to get into the presidential debate? I listened to quite a bit of Gary Johnson and I really think that had he been allowed to debate he would have convinced a massive number of people to vote for him because so many felt they had little choice with such poor candidates on both sides.

Why did you not vote Johnson this time and went with Trump? Was it because you felt you needed to vote for the lesser of 2 evils?
I think the debates should be open to any candidate polling more than 1%.
That 1% is a LOT of people. And of course if you aren't part of the debates you don't get any media coverage and you can't win.

As for why I didn't vote Johnson this election...2 reasons.
1. Main reason is I've never seen anything like Trump in my lifetime. He is a political unicorn and represented the opportunity for a real citizen (not a politician or lawyer) to be President. And of course his economic ideas.

2. In 2012 Johnson seemed strong and focused. I really liked him and his open talk about freedom and being "Pro-Everything" when they asked him about abortion. He straight up said he was for FREEDOM and liberty for individuals. That spoke to me.

BUT...in 2016, he just seemed goofy acting to me. The media was so anti-Trump that they mistakenly thought that Libertarians all vote Republican and they thought they could split the Republican vote if they gave Johnson some air time.

So CNN gave him a town hall that they broadcast live and CNN and MSNBC interviewed him several times in prime time.

That is when they discovered (to their shock and horror)...that Libertarians are more socially liberal than Democrats by far.
They then began attacking the hell out of Johnson and burying him. lol

But as I said...he made himself look goofy. Making weird faces and giving dumb answers to questions they asked him.

So I looked at the non-politician with similar ideas to mine on economics VS the goofy guy who no longer looked strong and divisive in Johnson and went with Trump.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 12:41 PM   #46
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken View Post
My perspective is that junkies COST to society. Meaning EVERYONE pays for their treatment, for their inability to work and so on and on. Not to mention some addicts actually steal or hurt in order to get the dose.
That are the reasons to prohibit it.

Same logic - some people say that safety belts should not be enforced as it is HIS/HER own life. Do you agree with that?
I do not because losing those lives actually COST to society (one less person to contribute etc etc). That is why they are enforced, even though it is his/her own life...
and what about the MILLIONS of fat what are getting sick and unable to work from mc donalds and all the other junk food labels - do you not want to prohibit them also with THE SAME argument?
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 01:22 PM   #47
Matt-ADX
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
I think the debates should be open to any candidate polling more than 1%.
That 1% is a LOT of people. And of course if you aren't part of the debates you don't get any media coverage and you can't win.

As for why I didn't vote Johnson this election...2 reasons.
1. Main reason is I've never seen anything like Trump in my lifetime. He is a political unicorn and represented the opportunity for a real citizen (not a politician or lawyer) to be President. And of course his economic ideas.
I think a lot of people felt that way, were you also in the mindset that perhaps a lot of what he was doing was pandering to the Republican base in order to win the nomination and would turn out to be far more liberal? I honestly thought a lot of it was show, it's still incredibly early but from what you see has your opinion needle in regards to him moved at all?
Matt-ADX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 01:40 PM   #48
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
I think the debates should be open to any candidate polling more than 1%.
That 1% is a LOT of people. And of course if you aren't part of the debates you don't get any media coverage and you can't win.

As for why I didn't vote Johnson this election...2 reasons.
1. Main reason is I've never seen anything like Trump in my lifetime. He is a political unicorn and represented the opportunity for a real citizen (not a politician or lawyer) to be President. And of course his economic ideas.

2. In 2012 Johnson seemed strong and focused. I really liked him and his open talk about freedom and being "Pro-Everything" when they asked him about abortion. He straight up said he was for FREEDOM and liberty for individuals. That spoke to me.

BUT...in 2016, he just seemed goofy acting to me. The media was so anti-Trump that they mistakenly thought that Libertarians all vote Republican and they thought they could split the Republican vote if they gave Johnson some air time.

So CNN gave him a town hall that they broadcast live and CNN and MSNBC interviewed him several times in prime time.

That is when they discovered (to their shock and horror)...that Libertarians are more socially liberal than Democrats by far.
They then began attacking the hell out of Johnson and burying him. lol

But as I said...he made himself look goofy. Making weird faces and giving dumb answers to questions they asked him.

So I looked at the non-politician with similar ideas to mine on economics VS the goofy guy who no longer looked strong and divisive in Johnson and went with Trump.
first of all robbie, my big compliment for being that brave to be the one in the middle who takes the hits from both sited.
I really like to read your posting here they are very different to the extremes we have here.

you are also completely right with what you stand for - I think here is nobody who really would prefer Hillary if there would be another candidate.

But the fish starts to stink from his head - and I TOTALLY agree with you that this what is called democracy in US is not even in the near of that.

i can NEVER understand how it can happen that a candidate what is definitely getting fewer votes as his rival can win the elections and it is still called democracy.
this election system STINKS up to the sky and has to be reformed URGENTLY.

i mean there are not really perfect democracies in the world - I would say that the swiss democracy is at least the best existing (also not perfect) but that is FAR from what is present in USA.

I think humanly you have trump already well-recognized (even if it all sounds quite harmless from you).

But as far as professionalism is concerned, you are probably right next to it if you expect a better economy through it.
From the political point of view, he is doing pretty much everything wrong.

The disaster is that "normal people" are not able to see the backgrounds when they report a change in the statistical formula for calculating the foreign trade deficit on the margins. The normal citizen knows nothing about it and does not want to know it either.


So he does not know what immense document falsification and spreading lies is behind it.


He is already preparing a formula what will make the historical numbers worse and I am sure he have in mind to change that formula again after a period he is the oval office. What makes him look as the better one (and he knows already that he wonīt be that)


I do not know if you have read about that and because of the complexity of this theme, the popular media donīt even touch it in the headlines.

That kind of strategy has NOTHING to do with better economics and the ideas he has around that CAN NOT work because they are completely against all logic and the complexity of a global market.

This boomerang will not fall back only to the USA (but it will hit the USA most) it will bring the whole world in a crisis were the 2008 crisis was a kiddy game in compare.

Indeed I am quite sure, that also the republican party have some smart heads who can see that already and they are prepared for the day when they have to kick him out. But what happens AFTER him?
Generations of "next presidents" have to try to fix that again and it gives generations of "next presidents" an apology for their own inability because until then America will know that Trump was by far the most stupid idea they had in the past 500 years.
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 02:41 PM   #49
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,841
thommy, a lot of what you are saying is conjecture.

Trump has already proved the "experts" wrong on the economy right out of the gate.

Check out some of these predictions the "Experts" made that have already been proven 100% wrong:
Economists: A Trump win would tank the markets - POLITICO

Donald Trump: A Huge Hedge Fund Predicts a Stock Market Correction | Fortune.com

I can keep posting those links because there are so many of them.
The media and the "experts" did everything they could to report "fake news" to stop Trump.

Reality? The stock market has risen to a new record. And over 2.9 TRILLION dollars in new wealth has been created from the stock market since the day of Trump's election.

The business community KNOWS that Trump's administration is "business friendly" as opposed to Pres. Obama's who had a contentious relationship with business at best.

That is what I voted for. The economy.

We have all been told by that same media and "experts" that we can never have a great economy again...and as you are saying: it's sooooo "complicated" in a global economy.

I don't think so myself. I think it's pretty damn simple.
The politicians got rich while shipping our jobs overseas.

Trump is changing that.
Now we will see if the media and the "experts" are right...or if they were lying to us and will end up wrong again.

Anyway, that's how I see it.

One thing is for sure...if things had just kept going the way they were, we were heading downward.
At least Trump represents a change from the status quo
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 02:52 PM   #50
Best-In-BC
Confirmed User
 
Best-In-BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyClips View Post
Good

We don't need any more potheads!
lol, dork
__________________
Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More
Unparked domains burning a hole in your pocket? 5 Simple Ways to Make Easy $$$ from Unused Domains
Best-In-BC is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
spicer, administration, trump, pot, sean, legal, country, epidemic, opioid, similar, kush, recreational, announce, wth, scourge



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright Đ 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.