MyFreeCams design: old school VS web2.0? - GoFuckYourself.com

mobstriker · 02-02-2017, 12:16 AM

Hi.
I work with crakrevenue long time.
Today I thought about myfreecams design.
I don't like it, honestly to say.
I think it could be more clean.
Something like chaturbate or runetki.

I started write this post to open discussion that they need modern web2.0 design, etc.
But after that I checked the engagement using similarweb.com
I saw that "old school" design does not affect the engagement. Vice Versa.
Modern desing has less pages per visit (livejasmin is winner with their web2.0)

December,2016

Code:

                    Livejasmin* Chaturbate MyFreeCams  Bongacams   Flirt4Free  Imlive   Runetki   Streamate  Cams.com
Total Visits        497.50M     195.60M    64.80M      132.90M     85.60M      22M      15.50M    5.30M      4M
Avg. Visit Duration 00:00:43    00:14:41   00:09:00    00:05:19    00:02:41    00:03:41 00:03:28  00:08:36   00:04:44
Pages per Visit     1.25        13.52      7.10        5.75        1.91        2.47     3.90      8.93       6.17
Bounce Rate         84.80%      24.29%     40.07%      42.38%      73.19%      40.55%   63.44%    69.95%     44.44%

* Measured by Google Analytics
Site owner has connected their Google Analytics account.

What is you favourite cam site design? (As for me, I like design on streamate, runetki)
Do you think, that design is important or not?
What do you think about myfreecams design?

dillfly2000 · 02-02-2017, 12:55 AM

I've had more success with chaturbate using the same promotion methods with both sites.

Presnus · 02-02-2017, 12:57 AM

I think those stats are more related to the traffic sources rather than design.

For example livejasmin uses a shitload of popups, this brings down the time on site.

PS: How did you get the source of the stats?

j3rkules · 02-02-2017, 03:32 AM

Yeah I think their design looks very outdated but their bounce rate is still ok I think. It is more about the content.

JamesDrews · 02-02-2017, 05:42 AM

I like the simple design of MFC, the website has loyal fans.

mobstriker · 02-02-2017, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dillfly2000

I've had more success with chaturbate using the same promotion methods with both sites.

chaturbate revshare or ppl? Chaturbate ppl very low I think.

mobstriker · 02-02-2017, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Presnus

I think those stats are more related to the traffic sources rather than design.

For example livejasmin uses a shitload of popups, this brings down the time on site.

PS: How did you get the source of the stats?

similarweb.com

they use google analytics and i think alexa too. Not bad site

PornDiscounts-V · 02-02-2017, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mobstriker

chaturbate revshare or ppl? Chaturbate ppl very low I think.

Revshare.

mobstriker · 02-02-2017, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvvvv

Revshare.

Yes! Revshare is good with them)

Speigelau · 02-02-2017, 01:45 PM

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

bns666 · 02-02-2017, 02:47 PM

it's not the most appealing design, but i guess it works for them

Barry-xlovecam · 02-02-2017, 03:05 PM

XloveCam.com - Online models

We can clone this to your domain css colors ... some images ...

WiredGuy · 02-02-2017, 03:22 PM

For me, Cams is one of those markets that are either a huge hit or a huge bust. MFC is a great hit with my traffic, so hopefully not a thing changes.
WG

kane · 02-02-2017, 03:44 PM

When it comes to cams I have always thought the models were more important than the design. You can have a kick ass design and amazing features, but if all of your models just sit there like zombies saying, "Tip for tits BB," it isn't going to work. If you have sexy, fun, engaging models people won't give a shit about the site's design.

j3rkules · 02-02-2017, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

When it comes to cams I have always thought the models were more important than the design. You can have a kick ass design and amazing features, but if all of your models just sit there like zombies saying, "Tip for tits BB," it isn't going to work. If you have sexy, fun, engaging models people won't give a shit about the site's design.

You are absolutely right, it is all about the content.

02-02-2017, 12:16 AM	#1
mobstriker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 177	MyFreeCams design: old school VS web2.0? Hi. I work with crakrevenue long time. Today I thought about myfreecams design. I don't like it, honestly to say. I think it could be more clean. Something like chaturbate or runetki. I started write this post to open discussion that they need modern web2.0 design, etc. But after that I checked the engagement using similarweb.com I saw that "old school" design does not affect the engagement. Vice Versa. Modern desing has less pages per visit (livejasmin is winner with their web2.0) December,2016 Code: Livejasmin* Chaturbate MyFreeCams Bongacams Flirt4Free Imlive Runetki Streamate Cams.com Total Visits 497.50M 195.60M 64.80M 132.90M 85.60M 22M 15.50M 5.30M 4M Avg. Visit Duration 00:00:43 00:14:41 00:09:00 00:05:19 00:02:41 00:03:41 00:03:28 00:08:36 00:04:44 Pages per Visit 1.25 13.52 7.10 5.75 1.91 2.47 3.90 8.93 6.17 Bounce Rate 84.80% 24.29% 40.07% 42.38% 73.19% 40.55% 63.44% 69.95% 44.44% * Measured by Google Analytics Site owner has connected their Google Analytics account. What is you favourite cam site design? (As for me, I like design on streamate, runetki) Do you think, that design is important or not? What do you think about myfreecams design?

02-02-2017, 12:55 AM	#2
dillfly2000 hey Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: with you Posts: 2,208	I've had more success with chaturbate using the same promotion methods with both sites. __________________ Casino Affiliate Programs - Easy Money $$$

02-02-2017, 03:32 AM	#4
j3rkules VIP Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 22,104	Yeah I think their design looks very outdated but their bounce rate is still ok I think. It is more about the content. __________________ How To Build A Porn Site And Make Money \| My Best $$$ Cam Sponsor 3 Top Adult Hosting Providers

02-02-2017, 02:47 PM	#11
bns666 Confirmed Fetishist Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Fetishland Posts: 11,473	it's not the most appealing design, but i guess it works for them __________________ ⭐ CAM SODA ⭐ STRIPCHAT ⭐ ⭐ CHATURBATE ⭐ SKYPE SEX CAMS ⭐

02-02-2017, 03:22 PM	#13
WiredGuy Pounding Googlebot Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 34,362	For me, Cams is one of those markets that are either a huge hit or a huge bust. MFC is a great hit with my traffic, so hopefully not a thing changes. WG __________________ I play with Google.

02-02-2017, 12:57 AM	#3
Presnus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 1,087	I think those stats are more related to the traffic sources rather than design. For example livejasmin uses a shitload of popups, this brings down the time on site. PS: How did you get the source of the stats?

02-02-2017, 05:42 AM	#5
JamesDrews Affiliate Industry Role: Join Date: May 2013 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 370	I like the simple design of MFC, the website has loyal fans.

02-02-2017, 01:45 PM	#10
Speigelau Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: OC Posts: 2,750	If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

02-02-2017, 03:05 PM	#12
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	XloveCam.com - Online models We can clone this to your domain css colors ... some images ...

02-02-2017, 03:44 PM	#14
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	When it comes to cams I have always thought the models were more important than the design. You can have a kick ass design and amazing features, but if all of your models just sit there like zombies saying, "Tip for tits BB," it isn't going to work. If you have sexy, fun, engaging models people won't give a shit about the site's design.