Until now I've held my tongue (fingers) on Trump, but this is completely moronic! - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

JFK · 12-08-2016, 09:18 AM

Fitty Moronic Trumps

BlackCrayon · 12-08-2016, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

you make it sound like this is a no-brainer, because this is all just a bs message board discussion... but if some politician came around and said "I want to increase taxes by 20%, we'll use those funds to improve environmental protection"... I'm pretty sure you would debate if having $1000s less income each year is worthwhile for a vague promise of "improve environmental protection"...

I'm not suggesting that there should be no environmental protection, but there needs to be a balance that will support robust economic growth, while preserving the environment the best we can...

like i said, companies who are spending money moving towards less emissions, less waste, etc should get a tax break, not increase. yeah, there has to be a balance but as time goes on we should be moving towards more "green' technology rather than sitting still or going backwards.

2MuchMark · 12-08-2016, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReggieDurango

How can he possibly pick THIS guy?!?.

I am not surprised. If the EPA continues to exist, it will just be a placemat. All really important regulations are about to be wiped out. Scary.

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

climate change is a hoax

Grow up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Links to scientific proof please.

Oh yeah, you don't need proof or science.t

Climate change deniers are lazy. There's no convincing them they are wrong, and they won't think for themselves.

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Trump will go down in history as the worst POTUS ever. He will be lucky to make it 2 years..

Even 2 months will be amazing. Scary, and amazing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MFCT

I think its pretty urgent that we need to remove all CO2 from the atmosphere ASAP, or we're all doomed..

We can't remove ALL of the CO2. We need it for life of course. What we need to do is reduce CO2, and other greenhouse gasses like Methane, really, really quickly. Tougher emmission standards and less reliance on fossil fuels are great first steps that lots of progressive countries are doing. The US was well on its way too but I see these very positive first steps about to turn and go backwards now. sad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

lol. This coming from you is hilarious. The burden of proof is on you believers and so far you have failed miserably. You show me the evidence it exists and I will disprove your evidence.

No dude, no. No one else should do your homework for you. The evidence is out there already. If you can't get it yourself, then at least read what NASA and NOAA have to say as they have all of the tools and spent all of the time to gather the evidence for you. It is YOUR responsibility to educate yourself.

Here is a good place to start. https://earthengine.google.com/timelapse/

If you are certain that NASA and NOAA, and 98% of scientists are wrong (and that oil companies are right), then it doesn't matter what anyone else has to say about it, because you won't believe it. Therefore, no one should waste their time trying to convince you.

[QUOTE=wehateporn;21364843]True, it's a globalist tax grab/QUOTE]

No, it's not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

It has been proven and is undeniable at this point--you are the only one left here. Your argument is that you grew up in Al Gore's state? That's impressive.. I guess you didn't go to Vanderbilt?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon

it shouldn't matter if you "believe" in climate change or not. we should all want to pollute this earth as little as possible. if you don't, you're just a short sighted asshole.

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

you are asking a loaded question, of course everyone wants to preserve the environment... the real question is more like, would you rather pay $2/gallon for gas or $3/gallon with slightly stricter environmental controls... if phrased correctly it becomes a debatable issue...

Really good point, and something that alot of people don't understand. Here's how I like to phrase it.

Imagine that a litre of gasoline costs $1.00. This includes the oil removed from the ground, refining and transportation and all kinds of other costs. $1.00.

The problem is that there is still another cost that is not included: The cost of the damage to the environment. The burned Gas goes into the air that we breathe, increasing medical costs. Other chemicals in the burned gas cause the warming of the planet, and damage to the ocean (ocean acidification). Etc.

So when we pay $1.00 today for a litre of gas, the true cost of that gas, is charged to us later, in the form of medical expenses and damage to the Earth. We won't pay it maybe, but our kids will.

The idea of a Carbon Tax, is to move the cost of the future damage, to today. By paying a little more, that money can be invested into source of energy that cause less damage, or hopefully no damage, to the earth and future generations. At the same time, we get cleaner air, cleaner water, and a choice when it comes on where we can get our energy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

When it comes to climate change I'm well aware how it's produced. By falsifying said "empirical evidence" and attacking anyone who disagrees.

No dude, not even close. But it doesn't matter now. Trump and his boys will be telling you exactly what you want to hear from now on, and help make gasoline as cheap as possible. You did hear what just happened with Trump, Russia, and the CEO of Exxon, right? Look it up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

I'm not suggesting that there should be no environmental protection, but there needs to be a balance that will support robust economic growth, while preserving the environment the best we can...

Grapesoda · 12-08-2016, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReggieDurango

Trump picks Scott Pruitt to head EPA - CNNPolitics.com

How can he possibly pick THIS guy?!?
How can any of you Trumpsters possibly defend this choice?

If you say, "climate change is a hoax", and you truly believe that in your soul, you are beyond saving.

I am beyond saving... it's time to get science involved and dump Hollywood and the API

wehateporn · 12-08-2016, 09:43 AM

The global warming 'science' believes that correlation = causation, this is a schoolboy error

wehateporn · 12-08-2016, 09:44 AM

2MuchMark · 12-08-2016, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

The global warming 'science' believes that correlation = causation, this is a schoolboy error

No. That is the last thing that any scientist believes. Whoever told you that is wrong or lying.

2MuchMark · 12-08-2016, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Weather and climate are not the same thing. The illustration is the scientist desperately trying to warn us of problems, and that little kid not understanding the problem, is the climate change denier.

wehateporn · 12-08-2016, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

No. That is the last thing that any scientist believes. Whoever told you that is wrong or lying.

A weak short-term correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature proves nothing about causation, the alarmists gloss over the fact that correlation does not imply causation, and that a 100 years is not enough time to establish the validity of such a relationship when it comes to earth's temperature history.

woj · 12-08-2016, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Really good point, and something that alot of people don't understand. Here's how I like to phrase it.

Imagine that a litre of gasoline costs $1.00. This includes the oil removed from the ground, refining and transportation and all kinds of other costs. $1.00.

The problem is that there is still another cost that is not included: The cost of the damage to the environment. The burned Gas goes into the air that we breathe, increasing medical costs. Other chemicals in the burned gas cause the warming of the planet, and damage to the ocean (ocean acidification). Etc.

So when we pay $1.00 today for a litre of gas, the true cost of that gas, is charged to us later, in the form of medical expenses and damage to the Earth. We won't pay it maybe, but our kids will.

The idea of a Carbon Tax, is to move the cost of the future damage, to today. By paying a little more, that money can be invested into source of energy that cause less damage, or hopefully no damage, to the earth and future generations. At the same time, we get cleaner air, cleaner water, and a choice when it comes on where we can get our energy.

that's true, but
a. it's impossible to calculate this "externality"
b. you are assuming government will actually use the funds for intended purpose
c. you are assuming that what government decides is really the best use of the $$

so imagine you use 1000 liters of gas per year, and liter of gas costs $1 and you think that all the damage costs another $1 = $2 total

with no government involvement you would spend $1000/year on gas, with your plan you would spend $2000/year... so you have $1000/year less that you know for a fact would be spent well, cause you are the one deciding...

maybe you will take that $1000 and spend it on planting trees in the backyard? maybe you will invest that in a solar panel company? maybe you will put it towards a purchase of an electric car?

on the other hand who knows how the government would spend it? more likely than not, it would be spent foolishly or stolen through cronyism...

wehateporn · 12-08-2016, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Weather and climate are not the same thing. The illustration is the scientist desperately trying to warn us of problems, and that little kid not understanding the problem, is the climate change denier.

The kid is teaching the scientist

'Climate change denier' is a term of propaganda

C H R I S · 12-08-2016, 10:30 AM

So many morons.

Must be nice not to give a shit about future generations.

Joshua G · 12-08-2016, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReggieDurango

If you say, "climate change is a hoax", and you truly believe that in your soul, you are beyond saving.

OP please be careful about treating climate change like a fundamentalist religion. you sound like george bush, when he said, you are either with us, or with the terrorists.

most of my own personal skepticism of the topic involves the political tactics of people in the climate change camp. The academic community, think tanks, donors, & activists all assert tremendous pressure on science to achieve a specific conclusion, & anyone that questions this dogma is treated poorly.

These tactics reflect poorly on the integrity of climate change dogma, if people that may have alternative ideas are demonized so outrageously. your comment being an example.

Groupthink, & demonizing scientists, is dangerous to science.

Joshua G · 12-08-2016, 12:00 PM

one more thing OP...the best scientists cant forecast the weather 5 days out. nevermind 1 year out, or 100.

the best economists cant forecast the national debt 10 years out. predictions from the 80s & 90s are wayyyy off.

the best pollsters & pundits could not forecast the 2016 election. they totally missed the voters that decided the election.

in 91, when the kuwaiti oil wells burned, the green people said it would be an environmental apocalypse. a couple years of cleaning, all good. & wasnt a polar ice cap supposed to be gone by now?

people who do long range forecasting, are almost always grossly wrong, when forecasting systems with dynamic inputs.

MiamiBoyz · 12-08-2016, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JesseQuinn

'proof' isn't a term that's used in science.

empirical evidence is, the totality of which indicates that our behavior is causing conditions that will render the planet inhospitable to humans

I honestly think the disconnect for many is rooted in a misunderstanding of how scientific knowledge is produced. I dunno if having a stronger focus on science in schools would change that, suspect it might be a start.

Americans have been systematically dumbed down to make them easy to control. For fuck sake most moronic Americans believe in God and have no concept of even the most basic fundamentals of how their own bodies work...much less how a planet works.

Women are taught to worry about 2 things...make sure your look "pretty" and your pussy doesn't smell. If they manage to get those 2 things accomplished then they feel complete.

Men are taught not to act like a fag and to love sports, guns, and the government (in that order).

There you go...a basic breakdown of the American educational system and just look around you to see the results.

Rochard · 12-08-2016, 12:17 PM

LOL. Sheep.

flashfire · 12-08-2016, 12:17 PM

Linda Mcmahon for small business admin...lol the hits keep coming

What company has a worse track record for crushing small business and abusing workers?

Oh but she donated 6M to a Trump supporting super pac

They literally loaded this people up with pills and worked them to an early death

DEAD WWE WRESTLERS UNDER 50

2MuchMark · 12-08-2016, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

A weak short-term correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature proves nothing about causation,

That's right, it doesn't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

a 100 years is not enough time to establish the validity of such a relationship when it comes to earth's temperature history.

Fortunately, there's alot more to go on that correlation: Evidence.

C H R I S · 12-08-2016, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

Linda Mcmahon for small business admin...lol the hits keep coming

What company has a worse track record for crushing small business and abusing workers?

Oh but she donated 6M to a Drumpf supporting super pac

They literally loaded this people up with pills and worked them to an early death

DEAD WWE WRESTLERS UNDER 50

His EPA pick is the worst, but I'm sure he will top that... Giuliani will be the icing on the cake - devil incarnate

Bladewire · 12-08-2016, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

one more thing OP...the best scientists cant forecast the weather 5 days out. nevermind 1 year out, or 100.

the best economists cant forecast the national debt 10 years out. predictions from the 80s & 90s are wayyyy off.

the best pollsters & pundits could not forecast the 2016 election. they totally missed the voters that decided the election.

in 91, when the kuwaiti oil wells burned, the green people said it would be an environmental apocalypse. a couple years of cleaning, all good. & wasnt a polar ice cap supposed to be gone by now?

people who do long range forecasting, are almost always grossly wrong, when forecasting systems with dynamic inputs.

Climate & weather are not the same.

"The difference between weather and climate is a measure of time. Weather is what conditions of the atmosphere are over a short period of time, and climate is how the atmosphere "behaves" over relatively long periods of time."

Barry-xlovecam · 12-08-2016, 12:33 PM

Check the News.

The appointee for the Department of McLabor ...

Good jobs for all

2MuchMark · 12-08-2016, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

that's true, but
a. it's impossible to calculate this "externality"

Maybe not calcuate, but there's certainly enough data to base highly accurate models on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

b. you are assuming government will actually use the funds for intended purpose

Yes of course. Might there be corruption? Sure. Might it be spent elsewhere? I hope not. We can hope it gets spent right. But right now, there is none at all, and the cost is our future, of future generations, rising tides, damage, storms, loss of animal and human life, etc etc. All of this can be measured now, and it is extremely expensive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

c. you are assuming that what government decides is really the best use of the $$

No. I'm assuming that the scientists know whats best, and that the governments will listen to the people when it comes to spending it in the right way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

so imagine you use 1000 liters of gas per year, and liter of gas costs $1 and you think that all the damage costs another $1 = $2 total

Ok.

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

with no government involvement you would spend $1000/year on gas, with your plan you would spend $2000/year... so you have $1000/year less that you know for a fact would be spent well, cause you are the one deciding...

Well, no really, no. Right now, your taxes are spent on schools, infrastructure, Police, Fire, etc. This new tax would be spent on the environment in 2 ways : 1, cleaning up the existing mess, and 2, helping to fund clean energy alternatives. If done right, and assuming there's little or no corruption etc, it can make a big difference.

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

maybe you will take that $1000 and spend it on planting trees in the backyard? maybe you will invest that in a solar panel company? maybe you will put it towards a purchase of an electric car?

Yes! All of those things can be good too and in fact they are already in place. You might pay that extra $1000, but the government might give you a tax break or refund for investing in solar, planting trees, or buying an EV.

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

on the other hand who knows how the government would spend it? more likely than not, it would be spent foolishly or stolen through cronyism...

Of course, and this is a legitimate concern. So if the governments impose a carbon tax and demand that we pay it, its up to us to make sure its spent in the right way.

Cheers!

2MuchMark · 12-08-2016, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

OP please be careful about treating climate change like a fundamentalist religion.you sound like george bush, when he said, you are either with us, or with the terrorists.

Unlike religion, Climate Change is a real thing. It's observable, and its measurable.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

most of my own personal skepticism of the topic involves the political tactics of people in the climate change camp.

So then ignore the politics. Start with Science, and end with Science. Try not to read news reports about science if you can. Skip the interpretation and go right to the source.

bronco67 · 12-08-2016, 01:21 PM

You know what's really ironic about this asshole Scott Pruitt? He actually has a pending lawsuit against the EPA, and will now inherit that lawsuit once he's in charge of it. Wow.

He's been heralded by conservatives as a crusader against "the EPA's activist agenda", and now he's in charge of it. It's shit that could only be in a movie. There literally is not a worse choice to put in charge of the organization who tries to keep big business from polluting everything they can as long as it makes them a buck.

bronco67 · 12-08-2016, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

one more thing OP...the best scientists cant forecast the weather 5 days out. nevermind 1 year out, or 100.

the best economists cant forecast the national debt 10 years out. predictions from the 80s & 90s are wayyyy off.

the best pollsters & pundits could not forecast the 2016 election. they totally missed the voters that decided the election.

in 91, when the kuwaiti oil wells burned, the green people said it would be an environmental apocalypse. a couple years of cleaning, all good. & wasnt a polar ice cap supposed to be gone by now?

people who do long range forecasting, are almost always grossly wrong, when forecasting systems with dynamic inputs.

OMG shut the fuck up you are so goddamn stupid. Stop having thoughts.

flashfire · 12-08-2016, 01:29 PM

Truth is the world is full of stupid people...so if the government is supposed to represent the people I guess they got it right

bronco67 · 12-08-2016, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

Truth is the world is full of stupid people...so if the government is supposed to represent the people I guess they got it right

You got it right. I feel like we're about to get the government we deserve.

woj · 12-08-2016, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Unlike religion, Climate Change is a real thing. It's observable, and its measurable.

So then ignore the politics. Start with Science, and end with Science. Try not to read news reports about science if you can. Skip the interpretation and go right to the source.

that would be like reading "realtor magazine" to find out when is a good time to invest in real estate, or reading wall street journal to learn if there is money to be made in the stock market, or watching CNN to find out if Tump has any chance of winning the election, etc...

woj · 12-08-2016, 02:16 PM

ever heard of "peak oil"? it was a big thing few decades ago, very similar to the current climate predictions actually... here are 36 predictions by "experts" published in peer reviewed journals, how many of them came true? all those predictions turned out to be so wrong that no one even talks about it any more...

nico-t · 12-08-2016, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

LOL. Sheep.

coming from you

Bladewire · 12-08-2016, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

ever heard of "peak oil"? it was a big thing few decades ago, very similar to the current climate predictions actually... here are 36 predictions by "experts" published in peer reviewed journals, how many of them came true? all those predictions turned out to be so wrong that no one even talks about it any more...

Google image search shows that image only coming up on consiracy, & fake news sites.

woj · 12-08-2016, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Google image search shows that image only coming up on consiracy, & fake news sites.

same information here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_o...ns_of_peak_oil

Bladewire · 12-08-2016, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

same information here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_o...ns_of_peak_oil

I don't see it there anywhere.

I do see the 1962 prediction in the graph you provided. 50 year old prediction then others taking guesses every few years.

Apple's & oranges to climate change.

Coup · 12-08-2016, 03:24 PM

If global warming why is cold outside?

Checkmate, LIEberals

woj · 12-08-2016, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

I don't see it there anywhere.

I do see the 1962 prediction in the graph you provided. 50 year old prediction then others taking guesses every few years.

Apple's & oranges to climate change.

there is a table there:

Pub. Made by Peak year/range Pub. Made by Peak year/range
1972 Esso About 2000 1999 Parker 2040
1972 United Nations By 2000 2000 A. A. Bartlett 2004 or 2019
1974 Hubbert 1991–2000 2000 Duncan 2006
1976 UK Dep. of Energy About 2000 2000 EIA 2021–2067; 2037 most likely
1977 Hubbert 1996 2000 EIA (WEO) Beyond 2020
1977 Ehrlich, et al. 2000 2001 Deffeyes 2003–2008
1979 Shell Plateau by 2004 2001 Goodstein 2007
1981 World Bank Plateau around 2000 2002 Smith 2010–2016
1985 J. Bookout 2020 2002 Campbell 2010
1989 Campbell 1989 2002 Cavallo 2025–2028
1994 L. F. Ivanhoe OPEC plateau 2000–2050 2003 Greene, et al. 2020–2050
1995 Petroconsultants 2005 2003 Laherrère 2010–2020
1997 Ivanhoe 2010 2003 Lynch No visible peak
1997 J. D. Edwards 2020 2003 Shell After 2025
1998 IEA 2014 2003 Simmons 2007–2009
1998 Campbell & Laherrère 2004 2004 Bakhitari 2006–2007
1999 Campbell 2010 2004 CERA After 2020
1999 Peter Odell 2060 2004 PFC Energy 2015–2020
A selection of estimates of the year of peak world oil production, compiled by the United States Energy Information Administration

point is that what "experts" predict should be taken with a grain of salt, they all failed miserably at predicting peak oil, so it's quite likely they aren't any more accurate this time around either...

noshit · 12-08-2016, 03:30 PM

Global Warming is Beyond a HOAX... It's Asinine

Climate change is REAL... we get 4 seasons here and I love it

.

onwebcam · 12-08-2016, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Grow up.

As I've already stated I grew up during the first attempt "global cooling"

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

No dude, no. No one else should do your homework for you. The evidence is out there already. If you can't get it yourself, then at least read what NASA and NOAA have to say as they have all of the tools and spent all of the time to gather the evidence for you. It is YOUR responsibility to educate yourself.

Here is a good place to start. https://earthengine.google.com/timelapse/

If you are certain that NASA and NOAA, and 98% of scientists are wrong (and that oil companies are right), then it doesn't matter what anyone else has to say about it, because you won't believe it. Therefore, no one should waste their time trying to convince you.

I've already done my research. It's a myth to push an agenda. That's it, nothing more. 98%? Where did you pull that figure from? Your ass?

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

No dude, not even close. But it doesn't matter now. Trump and his boys will be telling you exactly what you want to hear from now on, and help make gasoline as cheap as possible. You did hear what just happened with Trump, Russia, and the CEO of Exxon, right? Look it up.

I don't need Trump to tell me shit.. I made my determination that it's a scam long before Trump decided to run for President.

None of you will post your proof or "empirical evidence" because you know that I or others will debunk it. Since every bit of it has already been debunked.

Bladewire · 12-08-2016, 03:40 PM

^^ global warming denier meltdown ^^

"It snowed! Global warming is a hoax"

onwebcam · 12-08-2016, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

^^ global warming denier meltdown ^^

"It snowed! Global warming is a hoax"

Are you done reading all of those articles and watching all of those videos from the 70's? Let me guess. You didn't read or watch one..

Bladewire · 12-08-2016, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Are you done reading all of those articles and watching all of those videos from the 70's? Let me guess. You didn't read or watch one..

Dude. You don't believe it's getting warmer every year. You don't believe the ice caps are melting. You don't believe the sea levels are rising.

Proven facts.

onwebcam · 12-08-2016, 03:52 PM

The Phony War Against CO2
Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide has helped raise global food production and reduce poverty
The Phony War Against CO2 - WSJ

Bladewire · 12-08-2016, 04:05 PM

SekobA · 12-08-2016, 04:09 PM

He cant go only with his closest associates

2MuchMark · 12-08-2016, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

As I've already stated I grew up during the first attempt "global cooling"

I've already done my research. It's a myth to push an agenda. That's it, nothing more. 98%? Where did you pull that figure from? Your ass?

I don't need Trump to tell me shit.. I made my determination that it's a scam long before Trump decided to run for President.

None of you will post your proof or "empirical evidence" because you know that I or others will debunk it. Since every bit of it has already been debunked.

That's too bad. I expected more from you.

onwebcam · 12-08-2016, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Dude. You don't believe it's getting warmer every year. You don't believe the ice caps are melting. You don't believe the sea levels are rising.

Proven facts.

Who's facts? You do realize that more than half of the temperature data used is admittedly "estimated" > fake rather than actual readings. Most of the other half is readings in hot zones. One was actually placed next to AC condensers and a blacktop parking lot.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/...ture-data-set/

Bladewire · 12-08-2016, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Who's facts? You do realize that more than half of the temperature data used is admittedly "estimated" > fake rather than actual readings. Most of the other half is readings in hot zones. One was actually placed next to AC condensers and a blacktop parking lot.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/...ture-data-set/

Fake news climate change denier blog

I trust NASA over your conspiracy blogger

http://climate.nasa.gov

Barry-xlovecam · 12-08-2016, 05:13 PM

Whatever Happened to the Ozone Hole?

But WTF do the troublemaker leftard scientists know ...

Point is; the problem was identified and the reversal has been proven effective -- had we done nothing -- there may or not have been consequences. Cancers have increased anyway -- did less radiation exposure limit the increases?

By the time you prove or disprove this theory of global warming to your satisfaction the effects may not be reversible. I am 751 feet above sea level -- a bit close for comfort -- this land was underwater in prehistory. The land probably will not be underwater in my lifetime -- so who cares?

Bladewire · 12-08-2016, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Whatever Happened to the Ozone Hole?

But WTF do the troublemaker leftard scientists know ...

Point is; the problem was identified and the reversal has been proven effective -- had we done nothing -- there may or not have been consequences. Cancers have increased anyway -- did less radiation exposure limit the increases?

By the time you prove or disprove this theory of global warming to your satisfaction the effects may not be reversible. I am 751 feet above sea level -- a bit close for comfort -- this land was underwater in prehistory. The land probably will not be underwater in my lifetime -- so who cares?

That's the thing.

Global warming is happening, whether it's man-made or not, it's happening, and it has happened before, just at a much slower rate.

Climate change: it?s all happened before? | University of Cambridge

JesseQuinn · 12-08-2016, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz

Women are taught to worry about 2 things...make sure your look "pretty" and your pussy doesn't smell. If they manage to get those 2 things accomplished then they feel complete.

thank you for addressing my main concerns. I still don't feel complete though. I am concerned as to the impact of my hair color on my political stance. and yes whether that dye will make me smell.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

If global warming why is cold outside?

Checkmate, LIEberals

could you please s'il vous plait por favor not bring logic and reason into this? the conspiracy only works if we're all on board

slapass · 12-08-2016, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

You do realize the term "greenhouse gas" is used because green houses pump extra CO2 into the green house to make plants grow faster.?.. Given that, if you're concerned about food what do you think is better more CO2 or less? If you were someone who believed there are too many people on earth and you wanted them to have less food and shorten their lifespan and decrease that amount what would you do? Would you try and convince them what is actually good for them is bad?

CO2 is not a pollutant and anyone who claims it is, is a liar spreading false information. Most idiots that believe in this myth confuse carbon dioxide with carbon monoxide.

CO2 is called a greenhouse gas because of the the greenhouse effect. Stop spreading false information. If you understand photosynthesis then understand the system enough to know you are distorting the truth.

12-08-2016, 09:18 AM	#51
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,381	Fitty Moronic Trumps __________________ Sig Spot Available –contact JFK @ FUBARWebmasters.com FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

12-08-2016, 09:43 AM	#55
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,172	The global warming 'science' believes that correlation = causation, this is a schoolboy error __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

12-08-2016, 09:44 AM	#56
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,172	__________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

12-08-2016, 10:30 AM	#62
C H R I S Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Marina Del Rey Posts: 10,845	So many morons. Must be nice not to give a shit about future generations. __________________ C H R I S Retired Porn Veteran BH4L

12-08-2016, 12:17 PM	#66
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 70,237	LOL. Sheep. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

12-08-2016, 12:00 PM	#64
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	one more thing OP...the best scientists cant forecast the weather 5 days out. nevermind 1 year out, or 100. the best economists cant forecast the national debt 10 years out. predictions from the 80s & 90s are wayyyy off. the best pollsters & pundits could not forecast the 2016 election. they totally missed the voters that decided the election. in 91, when the kuwaiti oil wells burned, the green people said it would be an environmental apocalypse. a couple years of cleaning, all good. & wasnt a polar ice cap supposed to be gone by now? people who do long range forecasting, are almost always grossly wrong, when forecasting systems with dynamic inputs.

12-08-2016, 12:17 PM	#67
flashfire ICQ 1 6 7 8 5 3 4 9 2 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 13,098	Linda Mcmahon for small business admin...lol the hits keep coming What company has a worse track record for crushing small business and abusing workers? Oh but she donated 6M to a Trump supporting super pac They literally loaded this people up with pills and worked them to an early death DEAD WWE WRESTLERS UNDER 50

12-08-2016, 12:33 PM	#71
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Check the News. The appointee for the Department of McLabor ... Good jobs for all

12-08-2016, 01:21 PM	#74
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	You know what's really ironic about this asshole Scott Pruitt? He actually has a pending lawsuit against the EPA, and will now inherit that lawsuit once he's in charge of it. Wow. He's been heralded by conservatives as a crusader against "the EPA's activist agenda", and now he's in charge of it. It's shit that could only be in a movie. There literally is not a worse choice to put in charge of the organization who tries to keep big business from polluting everything they can as long as it makes them a buck. __________________

12-08-2016, 01:29 PM	#76
flashfire ICQ 1 6 7 8 5 3 4 9 2 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 13,098	Truth is the world is full of stupid people...so if the government is supposed to represent the people I guess they got it right

12-08-2016, 02:16 PM	#79
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,883	ever heard of "peak oil"? it was a big thing few decades ago, very similar to the current climate predictions actually... here are 36 predictions by "experts" published in peer reviewed journals, how many of them came true? all those predictions turned out to be so wrong that no one even talks about it any more... __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

12-08-2016, 03:24 PM	#84
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932	If global warming why is cold outside? Checkmate, LIEberals

12-08-2016, 03:30 PM	#86
noshit Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Midwest USA Posts: 1,582	Global Warming is Beyond a HOAX... It's Asinine Climate change is REAL... we get 4 seasons here and I love it . __________________

12-08-2016, 03:40 PM	#88
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,232	^^ global warming denier meltdown ^^ "It snowed! Global warming is a hoax"

12-08-2016, 03:52 PM	#91
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 26,766	The Phony War Against CO2 Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide has helped raise global food production and reduce poverty The Phony War Against CO2 - WSJ __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

12-08-2016, 04:05 PM	#92
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,232	__________________ Skype: CallTomNow

12-08-2016, 04:09 PM	#93
SekobA Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 567721649 Posts: 12,149	He cant go only with his closest associates __________________ Best Affiliate Program Available Start Promoting 25% REV-SHARE

12-08-2016, 05:13 PM	#97
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Whatever Happened to the Ozone Hole? But WTF do the troublemaker leftard scientists know ... Point is; the problem was identified and the reversal has been proven effective -- had we done nothing -- there may or not have been consequences. Cancers have increased anyway -- did less radiation exposure limit the increases? By the time you prove or disprove this theory of global warming to your satisfaction the effects may not be reversible. I am 751 feet above sea level -- a bit close for comfort -- this land was underwater in prehistory. The land probably will not be underwater in my lifetime -- so who cares?