View Single Post
Old 04-20-2017, 01:31 PM  
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I understand wanting to change some of the "essential" benefits of each policy. As a single guy, it is dumb for me to have to pay for insurance that covers pregnancy and birth control and gynecological exams. Just like it is dumb for a single woman to have to pay for insurance that covers dick problem and things that only happen to guys. Some married people or people with families need all that, but they should just offer versions for guys and girls that don't need all of that.
what about the people with no cars?
should their tax money not be used to build streets?
what about the rich people who give their children in private schools?
should their money not be used to build schools?
and last not least - what about the people who do not like wars?
should their money not be used to finance the military household?

this is called SOCIETY - but as US never had this you will probably not understand the advantages of "all for one and one for all"
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote