Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy

If they were in National Geographic, of course not. But I believe the intent of how they are used *may* have something to do with it. If you sell it as porn, then it is.

The argument could be, all of these 16 year old topless girls I took photos of were not shot as porn, so they are legal and 2257 exempt. Stick them on a site and use ccbill to bill for it. Wouldn't fly. But if you stuck them in a book and called it art, you'd get away with it.